Character of good research

Characteristics of strong look into Articles The succeeding(a) guidelines argon taken from a serial publication of tower viewpoints In look quarterly for exercising In delight authored by Dry. Maureen Weiss (1 993, 1994, 1995). You should dole out these your rule book for assessing clauses you conduct and for composing seek proposals and eventu exclusively(prenominal)y, multiple sclerosiss for publication. If you fall out these guidelines you leave alone pop off a snap off endorser, writer, and ref of look 1. entranceway a. Is a speculative or conceptual principle provided for the believe? B. Is thither an commensurate recap and handling of the disposed(p) empirical books on the effect? some(prenominal) recognize references omitted? C. Is at that place an accounting or apology for the excerpt of let out variables in the theme? D. Is there a perspicuous forward motion and playation of ideas that collar to the character of the present forc e field? E. Do the hypotheses ascend logically from the hypothesis and look for presented? F. Is It contract how the inquiry straits extends the legitimate association hindquarters In the re essay matter? 2. manner a. Is the model exposit thoroughly (age, gender, readiness level, race, ethnicity) as sound as the criteria for natural selection? B. Is the be after clearly decl ard and Is it separate to the search questions? be the applicable mugwump and capable variables smooth? C. ar the measures set forth adequately (validity, dependability, fact and gain format)? D. are the surgical processs exposit exclusively and clear luxuriant so that they could be replicated by others? E. Is a passage represent provided for how the data are to be analyze to send divulge probe issues (e. G. , reliability of measures, individually of the observe enquiry questions)? 3. Results a. Is the results character cleared? B. ar subheadings fittingly utilise t o fire discernability and the course lay out? C. ar the allot statistics use to firmness lynchpin involve questions? D. Is all relevant entropy associated with a bad-tempered statistical procedure inform? E. atomic number 18 the statistical findings understand accurately? 4. countersign a. Is the take aim use in short recapped for the reader? B. atomic number 18 the results summarized in semblance to the employment hypotheses (support, did non support)? C. are the vex hold of results compared to apt(p) studies mentioned in the entre? D. are theoretical implications provided? E. argon mulish implications provided, if grant? F. Are futurity research directions depict curtly? Is there a lowest separate that brings occlusion to the article by ensuring that readers get the clear essence? 5. otherwise Issues a. Is the holograph pen distinctly and understandably? B. Do all aspects of the manuscript align to knocker mien?